The line graph illustrates global water use in three different sectors between 1900 and 2000.
Overall, it is obviously seen from the graph, all of the sectors were showed upward trend in water use over the period. We can also see that water consumption in Brazil was overwhelmingly higher than in Congo.
In 1900, using water in agriculture was nearly 500 km^3. From 1900 to 1950, the consumption of water in agriculture rose to approximately 1000 km^3 and then it showed a sudden rise of 2000 km^3 in 2000. On the other hand, even if industrial and domestic water use were similar to each other over the period, industrial use jumped to almost 1000 km^3 when domestic use remained by nearly 300 km^3 in 2000.
In the year 2000, the population of Brazil and Congo were 176 million and 5.2 million respectively. It is clearly seen that water consumption of per person in Brazil (359 m^3) was much higher than in Congo. Moreover, Brazil consumed more water while Congo spend less water in irrigated fields with 26500 km^2 and 100 km^2 respectively.
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world. 78
- Life now is better than it was 100 years ago To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 52
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 84
- the two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...l, it is obviously seen from the graph, all of the sectors were showed upward trend in wat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76373626374 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55037994617 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554945054945 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.728239609 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221167301431 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11094753293 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507444727769 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158537244249 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344878224714 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.