In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert
to make important contributions.
Nowadays, enhancing the enterprises to reach the goals and having a remarkable achievement has gotten important. Regard this fact, there is a controversial question whether expressing, probably, beginners can make main contributions in compare to experts. I am afraid, I disagree with having an especial contribution by a beginner. The reasons to substantiate my idea is explored in the following.
To begin with, the experience can be the first and foremost reason to persuade us to choose the expert for our work. To put on the other hand, when the enterprise encounters difficulties, a new person without any experience has a lot of problems. Under such a circumstance, new problems going to happen and having terrible outcomes is inevitable. To easily perceive my words, consider a boss who is encountering with not demanding for their company's production, if he has no experience with these times, he makes the wrong decision and can destroy the company after one month.
Furthermore, important contribution depends on a lot factors such as courage, innovation and also experiences. To be specific, for the major contribution we do not need to be a beginner, necessarily, we have to be courage for choosing our purpose and start to go toward that. It is crystal clear, no one can have a particular place in history just because of being a beginner. consider an example to derive this fact home, Steve Jobs, the famous founder of Apple, was so courage for reaching his goal and never decided to give up, eventually, he came back to Apple and contribute an important part of the company.
Without any shadow of a doubt, using beginner has its positive effects on the improvements of the enterprises. Surely, the beginner wants to use new ideas and start to innovate, also the beginner does not use the repetition structure of the work. However, always an expert has to control this innovation and try to prevent the problems. But, the experts have to let the beginner making his own way of solving the solution. To make my point of view clear, Regard Hassan Kassaii, the famous musician in Iran, if he had followed the past's way, he would never change the Iranian music.
In conclusion, I do believe the important contribution by the beginner is not true in all cases. Since experience is an important issue in this case and also we have to regard, it needs a lot of factors like courage and innovation not being the beginner. However, we don't have to limit the beginner for innovation.
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expertto make important contributions. 54
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favoriterecreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits,however, and the city park department devotes little 50
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 88
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 50
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consider
...story just because of being a beginner. consider an example to derive this fact home, St...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ion not being the beginner. However, we dont have to limit the beginner for innovati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, as to, in conclusion, such as, i am afraid, in all cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89598108747 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92684952538 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539007092199 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5361150076 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.55 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118894883548 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392282889275 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393598386952 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733040906236 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04488724889 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.