Whether the painting was a work by Rembrandt
The reading asserts that the painting could not be a work by Rembrandt. However, all the point in the reading are questioned by the listening, claiming that the painting were actually painted by Rembrandt.
Firstly, the reading claims that the woman, a servant, in the portrait was dressed a fur collar which she couldn’t afford it. By contrast, the lecturer argues that the fur wasn’t belong to the original painting, because the pigment of the fur was painted over top of the original painting when the painting finished one hundred year later. Maybe they wanted the painting looking more valuable and the lady looking more rich. In this way, the lecturer contradicts the first idea in the reading.
Second, the reading states that the shadow and light of the painting do not fit together. While according to the lecturer, this is not the case. The lecturer presents that the added fur color was removed. The woman was wearing a light color cloth, the light was illuminating the woman face. Actually the original painting was Rembrandt composition which light was realistic and met the expert of people.
Finally, the reading holds that several pieces of wood glued together was not the way of Rembrandt painted. By casting doubt to the third idea of the reading, the professor in the listening point out when the fur color changed the wood panel also enlarged with added pieces glued to the side, to made the painting grander and valuable. But the painting indeed was worked by Rembrandt. Researchers found that the piece of wood in this painting was same as Rembrandt another painting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-14 | TiOluwani97 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | guna | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | nusybah | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | YasamanEsml | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors. 70
- The world is changing quickly. People are less happy than before. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors. 70
- gold mask 70
- gold mask 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, look, may, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98141263941 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48559092968 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494423791822 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.130434702 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429797977819 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174419606852 0.0996497079465 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168061878352 0.0662205650399 254% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279772284472 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714615184077 0.0443174109184 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.