Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should require to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
The effectiveness of knowledge over the past events depends on its implemented fields. In this prompt, the author asserts that there should be an obligation of history class for entire university students, regardless of their field of study. This is an idea with which I generally do not concur. Among the countless reasons which give adherence to my outlook, I would list most conspicuous ones in what follows.
The first striking fact which should be considered is the volume of the program which each student takes during her study in university. Indeed, during short duration, according to the type of program, a prolonged list of courses should be fulfilled by the student for her graduation. In this case, the requirement of extra irrelevant courses makes the schedule to be severe tough. As an instance, the consideration of education period in an undergraduate program is in average four years, and during this period 144 credits related to the main major of study should be passed by student. By division of the number of credits to the number of semesters, each approximately has to pass 18 credits for each semester to be qualified for bachelor degree. In this scenario, adding the additional courses, which helpfulness is skeptical, as a pointless action. Therefore, instead of adding a further and useless border and on the student syllabus, it is a sound action to provide a list of courses which are more informative for students' future occupations.
Another equally crucial reason which should be highlighted here is the required physical and mental efforts for these courses. In fact, studying any content or course demands a high level of energy and effort, this level of energy increases as the topic of study gets stranger. This fact is also verified by a noteworthy, intelligent study conducted in the Psychology Department of the Tehran University in Iran. According to this research, average energy requires for studying a topic varies based on the familiarities of the topic, while during the study of the familiar issue, a student spends 100 calories, during the study of unfamiliar ones, these calories are doubled. Therefore, this research shows how asking for extra disjointed courses such as history, leads to extra effort for students, which could be used for their main courses.
However, some people believe that knowledge in the past is beneficial, as it provides feedbacks of previous failures and prevents their repetition in current time. Although this thought in the first glance seems valid and wise, it overlooks a subtle point. Actually, in the educational syllabus, there is a required history course related to the main course. This course provides a proliferate background about the past of that major, and there is no demand for further study which is merely additional border on the program.
To wrap it up, according to the all aforementioned reasons it is explicitly obvious that the obligation of history courses in universities is useless. As student possesses a tough program, and extra course derives the student energy; moreover, the current study plan in each university allocates one sufficient history course.
- Some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is, in fact, the general welfare of all its people.Write a respons 62
- tpo18. 80
- 1.Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you tak 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 83
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...o the main course. This course provides a proliferate background about the past of that major...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, in fact, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2738.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 513.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33723196881 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29524192834 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.500974658869 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 829.8 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.77408141 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.454545455 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3181818182 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20700080379 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650086210609 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445001306036 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128721085104 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271299359101 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 86.8835125448 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.