In many professional sports, there is an increase in the number of athletes using banned
substances to improve their performance.
What are the causes of the phenomenon and what are some of the possible solutions?
The increase in the use of banned drugs has become a common problem the world over. In competitive sports, the use of illicit drugs amongst sports persons is soaring at a staggering rate, irrespective of their repercussions. This essay will argue that out of numerous the primary cause of drug abuse is to cope with stress, while to curb this concern establishment of anti-doping law is imperative.
The major cause of using illegal medicines is the pressure, many players face during their entire career. This is to say that fans and kith and kin of these players have a lot of expectations from them. They want them to perform well, gain more fame, and increase their monetary status. As a result, they use unfair means to compete with others through the use of those illegitimate agents which give them strength, stamina required by an outclass player. For instance, adrenaline, banned for all sports players because it increases the strength of the player to ten-folds, however it is permissible to use only in minute quantities under strict surveillance.
The tackle with this predicament, the governments should impose anti-doping law, according to which complete assessment of the Olympians should be done on a quarterly basis. This includes the dop test which describes the intake amount of drug which is not legally mandated a player. Moreover, legal action should be taken against them in terms of putting them behind the bars, heavy fine penalties and forbade them to play for a long duration. For example, a similar initiative was taken in Australia, and a cricket player was banned throughout their life, which resulted in the 60% decrease in drug abuse.
To conclude, the performance-enhancing drugs are being used by professional players in a reckless manner because of the peer pressure and fan-following. However, this evil could be culled through strict legislation which refrains them from using illicit drugs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | deep979kaur | 73 | view |
- Some people think that libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them. However, others do not agree.Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance forsport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child canbe taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views a 56
- Some people believe that children should be given lessons on how to manage money in school.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people say that raising the price of fast foods will solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- In recent years, more and more people are choosing to read e-books rather than paper books.Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...give them strength, stamina required by an outclass player. For instance, adrenaline, banne...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 85, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reckless manner" with adverb for "reckless"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... are being used by professional players in a reckless manner because of the peer pressure and fan-fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18412698413 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88985854998 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3909980436 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112248640983 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453592659587 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409072070718 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722908253768 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419802278881 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.