The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group:
"The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area. Although only a small percentage of the land will be sold to Smith, the proposed development will have disastrous consequences for our area. The company plans to build a small hotel on the land. Although they have promised to ensure the preservation of the sanctuary, there is no way that their plans will do anything but harm the sanctuary. There are no circumstances under which this sale will benefit our community, which relies on tourists who visit primarily to see our magnificient bird population"
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The argument states that the sale of a particular small land should have not been allowed because the buyer intends to build a hotel in that area and this would indubitably damage the environment, and thus the local economy. Yet, there are a few unwarranted assumption that need to be addressed in order for this argument to be valid.
The first unstated assumption is that this sale will not, in anyway, benefit their community. A hotel is a business venture by providing accommodation for travelers. For example, the population of this city might be dense, hotels scarce and the accommodation prices high. A new hotel could compete with other hotels, if there are any in this city, and lower the prices thus attracting new tourists. Even if we assume that the development of the hotel will harm the environment, this action might actually be beneficial to the local economy.
Another unwarranted assumption is that a small hotel built on a small land will harm birds place of living even though the company has promised to take necessary measures to prevent this. Maybe the company's promise is legally binding, that it is written on their contract or is overseen through the governor's office, not a verbal promise to the locale. Thus, if the company voids this deal, even if it was verbally conducted, the group can then take action. They have every reason to be skeptical about this sale, about unless they can provide proof that it will indubitably harm them, this argument falls apart.
Lastly, another unstated assumption is that this sanctuary is essential for the birds living in that area. We do not have any information about the landscape. For example, the land it might not be a jungle or any other area lush with vegetation and trees; thus, building a hotel on it will not ruin the birds' nests. If the hotel is built in the city, which might already have ruined the birds' living place, there is almost nothing concerning about it.
In conclusion, unless the protection group substantiates some of the logical flaws and unwarranted assumptiong in their argument, the residents do not need to worry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | sedalatianz | 50 | view |
| 2018-08-16 | avinash2618 | 72 | view |
| 2018-07-09 | mantav | 42 | view |
| 2016-09-16 | abhishek1702 | 41 | view |
| 2016-08-23 | dimplepatel16 | 50 | view |
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 75
- The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group:"The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is esse 50
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 75
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 54
- Scientific theories, which most people consider as 'fact,' almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as 'factual' with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future. 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 360 350
No. of Characters: 1709 1500
No. of Different Words: 171 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.356 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.747 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.54 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 78 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.657 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.318 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.568 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.09 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'assumptions'?
Suggestion: assumptions
...onomy. Yet, there are a few unwarranted assumption that need to be addressed in order for ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: IN_ANYWAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in any way'?
Suggestion: in any way
... assumption is that this sale will not, in anyway, benefit their community. A hotel is a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governors'' or 'governor's'?
Suggestion: governors'; governor's
...eir contract or is overseen through the governors office, not a verbal promise to the loc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1999, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...less the protection group substantiates some of the logical flaws and unwarranted assumptio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, anyway, first, if, lastly, may, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 55.5748502994 61% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 360.0 441.139720559 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85277777778 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60192088349 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 204.123752495 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477777777778 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7795493636 57.8364921388 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1875 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.324526521 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.70786347227 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 5.15768463074 19% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117049443958 0.218282227539 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425007079634 0.0743258471296 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310626191622 0.0701772020484 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117049443958 0.128457276422 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 98.500998004 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.