In any profession — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Every human being tries to be successful and excel in the position they are present in. The prompt suggests that people who are into business, politics, education, government should resign and step down every 5 years. In my opinion, I disagree with the recommendation and argue that it is the success and general welfare ratio that matters but not the number of years worked in a specific position.
To begin, business is started by someone who wants to make some money out of it and also serve people. There are delegates who are successful and still helping people on a global scale. For instance, Bill Gates has started Microsoft and it is one of the widely used operating system throughout the world. If he had stepped down after 5 years of his success, there wouldn’t be any change in the computers we use today.
Further, there are delegates who are good and help people in any sort of way. If the specific minister resigned after his/her term and if a minister who doesn’t much to people comes into authority then it will be a risk for the people. Society votes for a person for a reason. If the people are not satisfied they won’t the politician who is not helping them. Unless and until there is a strong reason there is no need for a politician to step down just because 5 years has been passed.
Education is the most important thing to shape up the career of the younger generation. If a person who is in a higher position related to education and is developing the education system that is the person who is beneficial for the society rather than one who is not so involved. A government is most responsible for the growth of the country. The economy of the country is solely dependent on how good the government is working. For instance, in India when Narendra Modi was re-elected as Prime Minister, the GDP of country has grown rapidly just because people trust him. If he would have resigned just because his term was over, then there would be different consequences.
At the end, it is the person who is in power decision that matters. It is not fair for anyone to step down just because the term has completed. If anyone is helping for the growth of the country and development of the society then they should be there in their position to serve for many years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2022-05-13 | Skittle_Mix07 | 70 | view |
| 2022-03-12 | Siam | 66 | view |
| 2021-12-16 | Sunita086 | 50 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | bomavo | 83 | view |
- "In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park, with abundant numbers of each species. However, in 2002 only four species of amphibians were observed in the park, and the numbers of each species w 50
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 58
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 50
- Claim: Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's major field of study.Reason: Acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated.Write a response in which yo 58
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station."WWAC must change from its current rock-music format because the number of listeners has been declining, even though the population in our listening area has been growing. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 582, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had resigned'?
Suggestion: had resigned
...ly just because people trust him. If he would have resigned just because his term was over, then th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, for instance, sort of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6399026764 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55093447789 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467153284672 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0870880665 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8095238095 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2380952381 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116524086604 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384042425562 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506730297831 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783498614327 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473742888892 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.