TPO 17
The lecturer and the reading discuss how pesticide can effect on birds population in the United States. Although the passage claims that several hypotheses that explain decrease birds population, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the reading passage points out that expanding human population and settlements will be destroyed birds' habitat, and their population will be decreased. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that growing urban has beneficial aspects for some birds. Big cities provide better and larger habitat for birds. Cities and city dwellers increase some birds like seagull and pigeon. Also, some birds like hawk and falcon found in the cities where pry population increase such as pigeons. Hence, their population will not decrease.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that by increasing population, the more forest will be destroyed for providing land that people can produce food. However, the professor argues that in future people use less and less land every year. Because they will use and introduction some craps that produce a lot of product in small lands so that they will not destroy birds habitant.
Finally, although the passage says that increase in the use of chemical pesticides will cause a decline in the bird population, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that due to two main changes, it is incorrect to project past history to the future. First, agriculture scientists are trying to produce less toxic pesticides. Second, they are also growing pest-resistant crops that are not delicate to pests and also are not dangerous for birds.
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently. 60
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 73
- TPO 31 80
- TPO 27 71
- Which one do you do you prefer? why?1. A company offering you a job with challenging and interesting projects but less vacation days.2. Another company offering you a job that is not challenging and interesting but has more vacation days 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 310, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun product seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of products'.
Suggestion: a lot of products
...nd introduction some craps that produce a lot of product in small lands so that they will not de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, second, so, well, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45112781955 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57542943822 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567669172932 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6954928561 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.571428571 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426193076884 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136075033871 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758855140943 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244160837534 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293770356947 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.