Certain personal qualities cannot be achieved through university studies ?
Do you agree or disagree with this statement ?
It is believed by some people that essential personal traits is not possible to achieve at university. In my perspective, I agree with the statement and believe that certain vital attributes cannot be learnt by studying the academic curriculum at university.
There are multiple reasons to support my argument that university students are not able to achieve obvious personal traits. The first and the most compelling reason is certain necessary vital qualities can be learnt better by experience than gaining know-how at university. In other words, practical experience is more important and necessary for achieving some attributes than merely relying on books and academic curriculum, which is not taught at university. For instance, significant qualities like cooking, driving are equally important to learn which are not taught at universities but are equally important for students. As a result, the university passed out students are ignorant about these personal qualities.
Another argument against why university curriculum does not help students in achieving necessary personal attributes is too much concentration of curriculum on current job requirements. To be precise, universities these days focus only on those subjects which are required in today's job market rather than concentrating on the holistic development of students. For example, according to a recent survey in western India, 85% of engineering colleges do not teach young children about personal finance or money management; thus, students cannot learn about vital personal qualities.
However, the other side that argues that university caters students to achieve personal traits should not be overlooked. University students do learn some important traits such as coordinating in a team, time management and stress management. These skills are important and students learn them in vivid ways at university.
In conclusion, although some of the personal traits can be achieved by studying at university, most of the vital attributes such as how to cook, drive, and money management which are equally essential to succeed in life, cannot be equipped by studying university subjects.
- Some people believe that it is important to give gifts to friends and family to show that we care about them. Others think that there are better ways to show that we care. DIscuss both views and give your opinion: 73
- Some new employees have just joined your company to gain work experience. Write a letter to them and say– What work do you do?– What will they be doing on their first day at work?– What should a person bring along on the first day? 73
- It is believed that children from countries with a high level of unemployment should be offered just with a primary education and should not be offered with a secondary education as anyways they will not get a job in the future.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many people work long hours leaving very little time for leisure activities Does this situation has more advantages or more disadvantages 76
- Some people believe that to be successful at sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion ? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...necessary vital qualities can be learnt better by experience than gaining know-how at ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...ry vital qualities can be learnt better by experience than gaining know-how at uni...
^^
Line 17, column 25, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...niversity. In conclusion, although some of the personal traits can be achieved by stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66972477064 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97837034249 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495412844037 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7887280601 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27521832099 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10275319145 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684763338848 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173235169758 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485634189983 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.