Nowadays, as the world is rapidly changing with more complexity, governments pay a lot of attention on teaching techniques to assist students not distract or bored in a class and help them to become more interested in their lessons. In this regard, some people believe that the best teaching technique is to explain the benefits of a particular subject outside the school. Although I agree to some extent with this viewpoint, I believe that some other options could be as useful as the mentioned option, which can be elaborated as follows.
To begin with, teaching the benefits of a subject in students’ lifestyle helps them to find their future ideal job easier. Tutors can teach them how this subject can be useful for a professional, in any occupation. As an example, teachers can explain how a doctor, engineer, workers, and so on can use the subject on their projects or work activities. Since students can better imagine the reality of a subject that helps others on their major, they pay more attention to learn it to have a better life outside the school.
Teachers can teach by gaming or doing funny things to capture students’ attention, particularly in some subjects which are facts that do not have a considerable impact on students’ lives. Although these types of subjects increase students’ knowledge, they have a negligible effect on their routine life. Learning poems is an example which can shed some light on this subject. Often students get bored when teachers teach ancient poems. In this situation, changing the place of the class into a nature sight with a musical playing increase students’ interests keenly, which consequently, helps them to easily learn the subject.
All in all, besides the subjects that have a direct impact on students’ lifestyle outside the school, some lessons are just a fact that should teach in a way not to distract children. I personally admit that teaching students in a way that they can use it in reality highly absorb students’ attention. However, in some subjects choosing other techniques such as playing games or changing the class place may have also remarkable effect on students’ attention.
- TPO 36- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universit 73
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Do you agree or disagree? 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, however, if, may, so, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13927576602 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93779045131 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479108635097 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1593044902 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417401761541 0.236089414692 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156986237525 0.076458572812 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546641100828 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273555435372 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665578918026 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.