Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion.
Of late, some people like movies from tablets and phones while others prefer theater. It is felt that enjoying movies through electronic gadgets outweighs the fun in the silver screen while others believe, an exhilarating experience in theatres outmatched any other. In my opinion, based on the entertainment quotient, the mode of viewing the motion pictures could opt after that.
On the one hand, if the people have a liking towards the opting mobile phones to enjoy movies although it is not grand, they have some explanations. Firstly, the movie tickets today are very expensive. The extensive growth in the entertainment industry has led to market monopoly which has resulted in increased prices. Secondly, the popcorn and snacks sold in the theatres presently are costlier than the costly tickets of the motion pictures. To illustrate, the price of food given in the theatres has risen due to the more and more demand of the people to munch out something during the running movie. Thus, for the real movie experience, an average family spend thousands of rupees that can upset the monthly budget.
On the other hand, the other people go after the silver screen for an entertaining experience they have explanations to advocate the same. Firstly, the sound system with Dolby Digital Technology which has taken a step up. People get an amazing experience from the 3D animation movies because it enlivens the films shown. Secondly, people like to go to the cinema also to get the feeling of large screens. The size of the screen gives a vibrant and vivid definition of the magnificent movies running. These trigger an adrenaline rush which is yet difficult to get from mobile gadgets and tablets.
In conclusion, it would be justifiably right to say that if an appealing movie is broadcast, the decisions to choose between view modes could be suggested after that. People may have different preferences based on their perceptions as well as their convenience; however, viewing one in theatre provides a larger than life experience.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-27 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 78 | view |
2019-09-29 | Agni | 56 | view |
2019-09-15 | Abhishek Biswas | 78 | view |
2019-09-15 | Abhishek Biswas | 78 | view |
2019-09-15 | Abhishek Biswas | 78 | view |
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 78
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 84
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 61
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 73
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10119047619 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66995970143 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565476190476 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1218344139 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.823529412 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160044004064 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460827244286 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403676659061 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956012005398 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264253774838 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.