Soon technology will provide smart cars: cars that virtually drive themselves. A computer in the car determines the speed and route to the desired destination. The computer is in continuous contact with a global positioning system and other technologies that will provide extremely accurate information about the location of the car, other cars on the road, congestion, accidents, and so forth. the human driver will be little more that a passenger. Smart cars promise to make driving sater, quicker, and less expensive.
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the idea of smart cars which providse auto drive system. With this in mind, the author claims that there are some benefits in using smart cars. On the other hand, the professor contradicts this idea and explains that it is not clear that whether smart cars have benefits or not.
First, the writer holds the view that smart cars are more safer and will provide less accident because of using many accurate sensors for detecting cars and obstacles in the route. Conversely, the lecturer makes it clear that since it is possible that some technological sensors and devices fail so the harsh accidents would be happen by using smart cars.
Second, While the reading selection points out that wide use of smart cars will reduce the traffic problems, the speaker refutes this idea and believing that it may people experience more traffic. since driving is much easier by this samrt car so, we will see a growing willingness to driving by this cars. Thus, the traffic congestion would not allow to using auto driving system.
Finally, the author brings this idea that the costs of driving will be decrease by using smart cars because they are controlled in a way to drive in direct path. Therefore, they need less repair of regularly replacement of their expensive items and equipments. However, the professor provides some reasons on the contrast of the speaker claim. She says that global positioning systems are much expensive and also some technology needed by these cars are costly and repair of them are much expensive than repair of ordinary cars.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 30 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephone has greaterinfluence on people’s lives than television has. 76
- tpo 27 83
- What is your approach to problem-solving, and how does it work for you? Use specific details to support your response. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r smart cars have benefits or not. First, the writer holds the view that sm...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 54, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'safer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: safer
...iter holds the view that smart cars are more safer and will provide less accident because ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld be happen by using smart cars. Second, While the reading selection poin...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
... it may people experience more traffic. since driving is much easier by this samrt ca...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llow to using auto driving system. Finally, the author brings this idea tha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, however, may, second, so, therefore, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0184501845 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31747243864 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531365313653 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9213589668 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262841415382 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983417487246 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470468914365 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165047503172 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131918469251 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.