Agree or Disagree? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that friends play a pivotal role in people's success through their life and career. Actually they have a profound impact on people's future, especially youngsters who spend most of their times with their friends. The ever-increasing prominence of friendship in the people's successfulness has aroused the longstanding controversy as to whether having the ability to maintaining a friendship is more important or the ability to make many friends easily. Although some people are amenable to the idea that the more friends someone has, the happier he is in the life, I resolutely possess the conviction the quality of friendship is more important than the quantity, and young people should learn to maintain their friendship. In the subsequent paragraphs, the most conspicuous reasons will vindicate my perspective.
First of all, it is significant to be mentioned that old friends are more reliable since people spend their time together and know about each other traits. Spending more time with them makes the rapport between two friends stronger, and as a result, they can rely on each other in the face of adversity. Take a personal experience as an example; when I had a midterm exam during high school, I didn't know how to study with the limited time that I had. Eventually, I asked two of my friends to help my learning the course. One of my friends that I have a deeper friendship with accepted my request and helped me to pass that course. But the other one, refuse my request since I hadn't a deep relationship with him. As a rule, maintaining friendships is closely correlated with someone's prosperity.
Another noteworthy point supporting my stance is that maintaining a friendship with someone can help us to gain new abilities which are necessary to become successful in life. Young people can learn about how to express their emotions or how to understand someone's emotions and try to sympathize with them. These abilities will be useful when people getting married or in their workplace. Results of a study conducted on a group of people aged 17 to 30, which I have recently read an article about, indicates that people who have a longstanding friendship with a limited number of people are more successful and happier in their marriage and life. This results may be attributed to the fact that maintaining a long friendship helps them learn about the ways of understanding people and how to cope with their special traits.
To recapitulate, considering the abovementioned reasons, one can effortlessly conclude that maintaining friendships with a limited number of people can benefit him in many ways and results in a happier life. It is highly recommended that youngsters should care about their relationships and try to maintain them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students do not respect teachers as much as they did in the past. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.Students are more interested in politics now than they were in the past. 86
- Agree or Disagree? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill. 70
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...reasing prominence of friendship in the peoples successfulness has aroused the longstan...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...as aroused the longstanding controversy as to whether having the ability to maintaining a fri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ad a midterm exam during high school, I didnt know how to study with the limited time...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 678, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...he other one, refuse my request since I hadnt a deep relationship with him. As a rule...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, may, so, as to, as a result, by and large, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05831533477 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9369504853 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470842332613 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7778899083 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.263157895 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3684210526 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285909004188 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954802198216 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720842797311 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182435701369 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641623348008 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.