tpo 29
The material discusses the migration of edmontosaurus every winter. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely edmontosaurus should migrate to find food. Next, living in herd could support the hypothesis of migration. Finally, edmontosaurus are physically capable to immigrate long distance.
Conversely, the lecture challenges the points, one specific contradiction is a hundred years ago the weather in Alaska's North Slope are warmer than today; furthermore, in the arctic region sun shined the whole day during the summer, which provided a good growing condition for plants, and edmontosaurus could live on the dead vegetations during the winter. In addition to that, living in a herd did not mean that edmontosaurus migrated, animals could live in herd for other purposes, such as extra protection from predators, For example, although elks live in herd, they do not migrate. One final point, young edmontosaurus physically did not able to migrate long distance. Given that edmontosaurs live in herd they could not migrate and leave young ones; moreover, juvenile edmontosaurus could not survive alone.
In summary, there are many discrepancies in the presented information.
- tpo 42 60
- young people nowadays do not have enough time to help their communites 76
- tpo 40 83
- tpo 54 3
- some people believe that when busy parents do not have time to spend with their kids, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games and sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things related to schoolwork? which of the two ap 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 604, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, they do not migrate. One final point, young edmontosaurus physically did not a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, while, for example, in addition, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 22.412803532 27% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 203.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64532019704 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99151493242 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.4391881464 49.2860985944 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.6 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3 7.06452816374 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317000144699 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114605006882 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060999528254 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146364277822 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104099825159 0.0443174109184 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.