Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
The government should support scientific research that does not have any practical use.
Once there was a famous saying, “science and technology are the primary productive forces.”Indeed, science and technology help us enjoy a better living environment and ensure us a better living standard. It’s crucial to continue scientific research day by day, month by month and year by year, and our government is trying her best to support scientific research, however, I do not think it’s appropriate to support research that do not have any practical use. My reasons are as follows.
For one thing, doing unpractical scientific research is a waste of time and energy. When we aim to achieve something, we need a clearly defined goal, then we make efforts to make ends meet. If a scientific research is unpractical, it won’t have a right target, which definitely makes the progress slowly. Not to say that there are a lot of practical researches to do, scientists can spend their time and energy on the existing technology to maximize the resource. For example, it’s more valuable to workout a way to decompose garbage than to do the unpractical researches.
For another, supporting unpractical research is a waste of money. It’s true that science can create wealth for us, but unpractical science creates nothing, at the same time, the government will have to allocate an amount of money on the research, which decreases other practical uses. We have a lot of districts to construct, a lot of jobless people to help and a lot of emergencies to handle. We need the money to be put on the most badly-needed place, and to solve the practical things.
Furthermore, supporting unpractical research is a waste resource. Doing scientific research may needs raw materials, precise instrument, maybe a trip to explore the so-called “truth”, which is of no value to our society. On the contrary, if scientists only do scientific research that have practical use, it will surely save energy, as well as their time and energy, which can be used in some other practical aspects, and creates a win-win situation to people and society.
In a word, the government should not support scientific research that does not have any practical use. As is said above, it’s a waste of time, money and resource.
- If you are going to graduate from the university and have to choose the final course, which professor will you choose? The one whose course you used to sign up for or the one you have never learned from before? 76
- You have long been friend with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: nowadays people are more willing to rely on themselves and family help and less willing to rely on the government when they meet problems. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvements for the quality of people’s lives have already taken place. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific research'.
Suggestion: scientific research
...n we make efforts to make ends meet. If a scientific research is unpractical, it won't have a ri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, well, for example, as well as, for one thing, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12466124661 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08887695314 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490514905149 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6166826286 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.235294118 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296444011584 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110512595135 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13822017574 0.0737576698707 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210570377456 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963777415266 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.