“In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.
Recently, ideology regarding different ideas has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "does a common man suffer from a group's ideology?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is possible, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the public perspective standpoint, new ideology is bound up inextricably with human mind, which indicates it leads to both different viewpoints and widespread opinions. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between creative thinking and stimulus mind as well as an exponential increase in mind power. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of general knowledge is correlated positively with not only new theory but also investigation.
Within the realm of psychological, without the slightest doubt, decision making attribute to people's argument, in that it would come down to effective discussion, major success, and drawing conclusion. A salient example of such attribution is strong leadership, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take management for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint self-centered manager’s problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to personal responsibility, respective behavior, and even good comment. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of others perception.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that a common man suffers from a group's ideology. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Anand_DD | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Sidra018 | 80 | view |
- Many people think regions affect successful persons. What are your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to? 88
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 88
- ’In future illiterate will not be those who cannot read, but those who do not learn’ – By some writer. Discuss what do you understand by this statement and state your reason. 85
- Some people think imported food exerts positive impacts on our lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...n 'does a common man suffer from a groups ideology?'. Whereas it is a widely...
^^^^^^
Line 19, column 94, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...est doubt, decision making attribute to peoples argument, in that it would come down to...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 25, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...elieve that a common man suffers from a groups ideology. However, with the benefit of ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86832740214 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30253328602 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701067615658 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0492278946 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.846153846 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227354948955 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606774509298 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916363770501 0.071462118173 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13526197514 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823710956376 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.