The following table provides information about dates opened and kilometers of the route as well as the number of passengers traveling per year in 6 different countries (London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles) through the underground railway networks.
Overall, London is in top position with large transportation system. Meanwhile, Kyoto occupies the last place in terms of railway networks. On the other hand, the number of persons traveling in a year is huge in number in Tokyo. Among all countries, people in Kyoto are traveling less in number.
In 1893 London subway system hits a top position with exactly 394 kilometers. Furthermore, Paris and Tokyo opened in 1900 and 1927 with 199 and 155 kilometers respectively. Washington DC is in the third position from last with 126 kilometers. Los Angeles with 28 kilometers opened in 2001. Kyoto has less subway system with 11 kilometers opened in 1981.
In contrast, Tokyo is in the first position in terms of passengers with 1927 million per year while Paris and London are in second and third positions with regarding transportation systems. In terms of passengers, there is a slight difference of 5 million per year between Kyoto and Los Angeles. Washington DC is in a decent position with 144 million per year.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 67
- underground railway systems 56
- underground railway systems 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: huge
...umber of persons traveling in a year is huge in number in Tokyo. Among all countries, people i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
...ountries, people in Kyoto are traveling less in number. In 1893 London subway system hits a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, third, well, while, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10377358491 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84314643768 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495283018868 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.7541313469 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2307692308 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3076923077 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11926476788 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443525509544 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565766288318 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785800161299 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510398908501 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.