The pie charts and table give information about the total value and source of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The bar chart and table illustrates the information about total import of fish from United States through China, Canada and others and its entire value between 1998 to 2002 at four and eight years interval.
Overall, it is clearly seen that Canada imported fish 60 % which is overwhelming quantity in 1988 while, china and other imported on 13 % and 27 % respectively. Regarding the table of 1988, total value of fish import was 6.57 Billion Dollars. Although, in 1992, Canada dropped their value 24% but, in the mean time, China and other step up their import and reach 20 % and 46 %. Even though, amount of Dollars also enhances marginally with almost 02 Billion Dollars. Lastly, Canada and others decreased their level off by slightly difference. Whereas, china steeply increased 10 % in 2000, wherein, the value of Dollar raised also more than the last year.
To end, the bar chart demonstrated that the China and other significantly expanded their % howbeit, Canada decreased their level off
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-03 | Muhammad Waleed Khan | 56 | view |
- Scientist has been warning for many years about the importance of protecting the environment and that we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this, what are the reasons for that and how people can be enc 78
- Doctors in many countries concerned that people are not getting enough physical exercise. What causes this? How this can be solved? 78
- Some people think that watching sport is wastage of time during leisure time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while other think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The world of work is changing rapidly. Working conditions today are not the same as before and people no longer rely on taking one job for life. Discuss the possible causes for these changes and give your suggestion for how people should prepare for work 96
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 1615.20841683 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 163.0 315.596192385 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0981595092 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 4.20363070211 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51504125731 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 176.041082164 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650306748466 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 506.74238477 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7490643608 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255980908911 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112866874579 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116394829928 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172743530513 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10789850953 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 78.4519038076 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.