Some people spent a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this is a good or bad thing?

Essay topics:

Some people spent a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this is a good or bad thing?

In today’s era, concerts and sporting events play a vital role in stress relief. Some experts claim that it is not good to spend a lot of money on this whilst a few others disagree with the opinion. I firmly believe that spending an enormous amount of money on tickets will seriously affect one’s finance and family.

To start with, people who over indulge in live programmes are the least bothered about the ticket prices. Their primary motive is to buy tickets at that moment, regardless of the cost. Now-a-days, due to the excessive coverage that these events receive in the media, many fans are eager to be a part of them. Young people, especially teenagers, often assume that watching a live event will make them appear cool and elevate their status among their friends. Unfortunately, they do not realize that this habit can jeopardize their budget. Over spending can push people into the debt trap. It could even hurt family relationships because when someone spends too much money for watching such events, their family will also suffer. Worse still, children of such parents may copy this behaviour and run into trouble in future.

On the other hand, watching an event occasionally is good because it is a stress buster. In addition, being among a cheering crowd can lift up one’s mood. In addition, watching a live event and rooting for one team is an opportunity for people to express their patriotism.

To recapitulate, people should be careful about spending money on cultural or sporting events. Once in a while it is perfectly all right to indulge in such practices, but we must ensure that it does not become an obsession.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-07 hpsk71 73 view
2019-10-07 randhawa.harpreetk91@gmail.com 70 view
Essays by user hpsk71 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 812, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...opy this behaviour and run into trouble in future. On the other hand, watching an ev...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, while, in addition, to start with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93950177936 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55239791616 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619217081851 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.254091943 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.75 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196635751239 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062045052354 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071020744029 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121647343717 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058003305071 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.