The line graph below shows the number of serious crimes that occurred in London between 2003 and 2012.
The line graph compares how many armed robberies, assaults and murders that happened in London from 2003 to 2012.
Overall, the number of committed armed robberies decreased significantly over the entire period while assault cases increased. It is also noticeable that murder's figure remained relatively stable.
The recorded cases of armed robbery started at just under 3,500 in 2003 then it rose slightly to peak at around 3,700 in the following year. The figure dropped every year to hit a low of about 1,500 in 2008 before climbing to approximately 1,500 in 2012.
With regard to assault cases, there were almost 2,300 committed cases in 2003 which by far the highest overall, after which it fluctuated in the succeeding 5 years, when the lowest number of cases was noted, and subsequently rose to peak at roughly 2,800 in the final year. Murder's number hovered between just under 1,000 and 500 cases throughout the period.
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a species of a large fish called the salmon. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 80
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has the technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 61
- The line graph below shows the number of serious crimes that occurred in London between 2003 and 2012 61
- The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12337662338 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48762326784 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0723738215 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148771555648 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714535985632 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742679562557 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102217490105 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828281387807 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.