In general, people do not have such a close relationship with their neighbors as they did in the past .
Why is this so , and what can be done to improve contact between neighbors?
Neighbors in the past used to have a major role in life, which is that they would help in any problems and actually being a good friend in general. Nowadays people have grown distant from one another that they wouldn’t even know who their neighbors are, thus people have been socially isolated.
There are a couple of reasons to which people have been enclosed. To begin with, the public now would move from area to area, and they wouldn’t linger in the same district for long. Therefore, if they did interact with the neighbors it would only be a temporary friendship, which they would only get attached to if the neighbors where actually friendly. Then, in the present women and men spend more time at their jobs than home, but in the past a few of the women worked and men usually arrived home early. Hence, they have created a stronger bond with their colleagues than their neighbors.
For every problem there exists a solution, consequently several solutions exist for the bond between neighbors. First, the owners of the compound could build between every 4 buildings an area where neighbors could meet like a playground for the kids. Second, when a person is new in the region they should go and question their neighbors about the community. These resolutions won’t strengthen the bond between the neighbors as it was in the past, but somehow it would at least create a bond.
To sum up, people have lingered apart as the years passed due to not settling permanently and contributing most of the time at work. Bonds between neighbors could be recreated by communication and having a common interest or activity.
- Some people think that developed countries have higher responsibilities to compact climate change than developing countries. Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities towards protecting the environment 73
- The table below gives information about UK independent films . 56
- In general, people do not have such a close relationship with their neighbors as they did in the past . Why is this so , and what can be done to improve contact between neighbors? 73
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both of views an 56
- The charts below show degree granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990 ,2000 and 2010 . 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Neighbors in the past used to have a maj...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s people have been socially isolated. There are a couple of reasons to which p...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir colleagues than their neighbors. For every problem there exists a solutio...
^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omehow it would at least create a bond. To sum up, people have lingered apart...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, at least, in general, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57350858335 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578571428571 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8833606201 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.615384615 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310712450646 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112475855406 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062262802537 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194729171944 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498907535026 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.