Some people think schools should educate pupils according to their academic ability, and others believe pupils with different abilities should be educated together. Discuss both views and give your opinion
In the salad days of the millennium, the society is polarised almost equally, regarding the notion that weather academic institutions should train the scholars according to their good performance or the children should be coached together. Different people have their distinct mindset. The following paragraph would shed light on the both the views before giving the final note.
To commence with the notion, their are myriad of things to be shared in it's favor. First and foremost, it could be good approach, while teaching the student according to their ability. As a result, the teacher have to put less effort and at the same time the juvenile are going to perceive the knowledge. Secondly, there would be greater competition among the scholar. Consequently, the schools will be providing the bright gems as level of intellect between children would be at the peak.
Shifting towards the second school of thought, the youngster with distinct abilities shall be educated together because adolescent pupils are very creative. Hence, the mixture of the scholar with great extent of knowledge and other skills would be required in the school. Moreover, only great mind is not required to capture the aim sports and other parametres also help to complete the hurdles. Therefore, all the activities like sports, cultural, literary skills are also required.
To conclude, there are many supporters those say that youth should be educated according to there academic ability but my argument proves that all candidates of differential abilities should be educated because this the most appropriate way to deal this situation
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | zhila Emami | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Naman Kumar Singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Naman Kumar Singh | 61 | view |
- For some people, consumer goods become the most important thing in life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantage 11
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 56
- Some people think that it is vital to donate money in constructing to new railway line, while others believe that improving the existing one is better. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 78
- The chart displays the quantity of oil production and consumption in million barrels per day in seven areas of the world in the year 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant. 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Othersbelieve that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and gi 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the views before giving the final note. To commence with the notion, their are m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...e. To commence with the notion, their are myriad of things to be shared in it...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ral, literary skills are also required. To conclude, there are many supporters t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33720930233 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63587835384 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62015503876 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9886981479 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.923076923 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361742027466 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09922103368 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734103122463 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194236404598 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524972619133 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.