Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There has been increasing interested in online communication in recent years as a global phenomenon. While a great number of people still skeptical about the explosion of this common trend, I content that the benefits outperform the drawbacks in this circumstance.
On the one hand, it seems undeniable that online interaction makes a breakthrough in many fields due to some prime reasons. To begin with, the wide-spread integration of online technologies into human connection is essential especially in the offices or enterprises because it encourages people to exchange information more conveniently than the traditional methods. As a result, it deems to be a useful aid which pave the way for the sake of working process. Additionally, accompanying with the online technological development, several social networking websites are generated such as facebook, twitter and so on. Therefore, people may have a chance to strike up new relationships as well as new careers from the internet. Personal trainer perfectly exemplifies this situation, due to the hectic schedules at work people are very vulnerable to overweight. And they could be trained at home by online coaches without spending too much of their time.
On the other hand, there is still a dark side to this case. First of all, in spite of the fact that digital platforms facilitate the communication between people more easily, it has to depend a lot on the network quality. People connection can be interrupted which pose a serious threat to the work efficiency especially in important economic conversations. Secondly, there is no doubt that the lack of face-to-face interaction may result in various detrimental effects. For example, students have a tendency to lose motivation in online learning than offline. Consequently, it exerts a negative influence on the quality of their understanding.
To conclude, although online communication comprises both pros and cons, I wholly believe that the benefits still surpass the drawbacks of this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | wardiati | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Tt617 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | phanduydat | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | phanduydat | 11 | view |
- Task 2: The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem? 84
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, car and other items. Why is it? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- abc 11
- It is more important to spend public money promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in spite of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40506329114 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.202756784 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4138833402 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.875 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0620783715032 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0197133961016 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246628416245 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0359994002859 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017259175845 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.