Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Thanks to the advancement of technology, the business activities such as meeting, discussion and training can be done using digital technology. In my point of view, this will significant advantages that I will outline in this essay.
Regarding the benefits, we should not ignore various merits that technology devices such as a computer can bring to the business world. First of all, by employing technology devices the workers can manage their time-table effectively as they could perform their job everywhere. Take working mothers, for instance, they can do their job responsibility at home while taking care of their households. This will cut the employees' stress due to their family reason and in the end, it is could increase their productivity. Furthermore, for multi-national companies having several branches around the world, to conduct a face-to-face meeting require much time and financial budget. By using technological devices, business conferences can be delivered digitally. As a result, the companies could minimize their financial expenditure and have an effective meeting at the same time.
However, we should not ignore various drawbacks that the digitalized business interaction could be caused. Firstly, not all-region in the world has a high-speed internet connection. For developing countries such as Indonesia, many areas covered by low-speed internet connection. That will lead a miscommunication if the connection interrupts while the meeting on progress. Moreover, providing online training for the employees will be less effective as the trainer and the training participants have indirect interaction. Some employees will need direct guidance to fully understand what they learn about and this will not be achieved by using a video tutorial. As a result, the training will not improve the skill of the participants.
To sum up, although there are drawbacks of using digital technology to do a business interaction, I believe that the benefits resulted from this method is greater.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | wardiati | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Tt617 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | phanduydat | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | phanduydat | 11 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt within in the three countries .Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 67
- The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
... their family reason and in the end, it is could increase their productivity. Furt...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, for instance, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57467532468 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12245679951 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5687418411 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.095798402934 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327125997934 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376468227029 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709312408508 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285562559562 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.