People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
A large number of people are a victim of impulsive behavior where they tend to act before they think about the consequences of the action. I believe that the people who try to reason out their actions without logical consideration and doing it solely based on their emotions are poor decision makers.
In any situation, it is very important to think before we act. There are various reactions that people have for each emotion that is triggered in them. For example, people tend to lash out during an argument and say things which makes them regret later once they've calmed down. Such emotional reactions could have a lot of repercussions causing damage to their relationships and many other things. It is extremely important to think once before saying anything or making any decision in the heat of the moment to analyze the pros and cons of doing the same. A lot of mishaps that occur in such situations due to impulsiveness could be avoided.
Another example of making decisions based on emotion as an act of a poor decision maker is, if, in a company, the manager was extremely hungry for power and refused to put more thought into the plan of the company's future, instead, took actions just because of his greed to succeed, could end up in a state of loss. Such situations could also be the reason for certain firms to go bankrupt.
It is pretty clear that, from a sad person jumping at the first sight of sweets and savory to curb his emotions, without thinking about the adverse effects of poor diet, to a person who ends up spending all of his money on unnecessary luxury items which may not even be of use to him/her later on, all show clear examples of poor decision-making.
Good decision makers follow a systematic sequence of strategic thinking which explores all possible consequences of certain actions logically ensuring least risk and most benefits out of any situation. Hence, it is apparent that poor decision makers are the ones who fall prey to their emotions and end up explaining their actions later on with no rational backing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
A large number of people are a victim of impulsive behavi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...ings which makes them regret later once theyve calmed down. Such emotional reactions c...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 143, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'ensuring the least'.
Suggestion: ensuring the least
...nsequences of certain actions logically ensuring least risk and most benefits out of any situa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, may, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7905027933 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56731872447 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555865921788 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.8327441641 60.3974514979 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.923076923 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5384615385 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303807837475 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983948555393 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097735613271 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172480826814 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565417813562 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.