do you agree or disagree with the following statement? technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In contemporary society, it is undeniable that technology plays a key role in many aspects of life. However, some people argue that modern technology is damaging children's creativity. Although it seems possible, I strongly disagree with such notion. This essay will provide further aspects and examples to support this idea.
First and foremost, technology allows people to learn quicker. There days, people's access to useful information is quite enhanced by state-of-the-art technology. I can attest this from my own experience, when I studied at Chulalongkorn University, most architecture students utilized the internet to search some information about their final thesis project. Moreover, the internet was usually used as a tool for connecting files to each other students. For this reason, the internet these days supports most people gain access to large information than before. It decreases time for connecting other people, so both student and teacher will closer and be capable to readily exchange their aspects.
Secondly, technology broadens many people's creativity horizon. Nowadays, children can readily receive information from other part in the world; They are always connected by technology such as television or internet. Therefore, both children and adults know wider than before, and this is essential to creative thinking because the more knowledge one knows the more creativity one has. To illustrate this, television is essential for my family a lot. Since there is television in my house, I always update a daily news every morning. Moreover, I watch a lot of news and documentaries, and obviously both are not only necessary to improve knowledge but also for being a creative person.
In conclusion, I totally disagree this notion. This is because technology has not made children less creative, but it clearly supports they to learn and create innovation. Additionally, technology connects people together and decreases time for learning to be a creative person.
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers. 70
- Students at universities often have a choice of places to live. They may choose to live in university dormitories, or they may choose to live in apartments in the community. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the opinion: People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.27414330218 4.8611393121 129% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.58616286459 2.67179642975 172% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582554517134 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8152628231 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.875 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134975519172 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555866596816 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510064585576 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099112094349 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295976489813 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 11.7677419355 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 58.1214874552 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.09 10.9000537634 175% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.