Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Leaders are the bedrock of any organisation that they form a part of. They embody the essential characteristics of effective moral judgement and strive to treat their contemporaries with respect. Both the preceeding qualities are equally important for an inspiring and efficient leader. Therefore, I do not agree with the fact that possessing sound moral judgement triumphs the quality of respecting one's peers.
I treat both of the above qualities to be equal in priority.
A leader has to take quick and crucial decisions at multiple times. These decisions have a lot on stake for everyone involved in the organisation. A favorable outcome from these decisions depends on the ability of the leader to take correct moral steps. Without it, hasty decisions would be taken which in turn render the leader ineffective. For instance, a leader of a big multi-national company that manufactures medicines is notified that their highest selling drug has some possibly detrimental chemical anomalies. If he chooses to ignore this piece of information and continues to sell the drug publicly, he is putting the public and the company at risk. He is an ineffective leader due to lack of proper moral judgement.
It is equally imperative for a leader to envoke a sense of respect from his peers. This feeling of respect has to be mutual. The success of the organisation will depend on the performance of its employees. This is turn will be dictated to a large extent by the ability of the employees to execute the plans set out by the leader. In a case where the leader does not respect his peers, they would reciprocate his disrespect. This would hamper the intention of the peers to execute the plans laid out by the leader. No matter how good the plans set out by the leader are, if the employees do not execute them earnestly, the organisation is bound to fail. A lack of respect from the leader towards his peers will inevitably lead to a complete failure. An instance of this is a currently lean but growing organisation, like a startup. Everyone in the organisation is relatively new and the leader is unfriendly with his peers. He does not respect the opinions of his colleagues. Due to this, they stop suggesting new creative ideas to the leader. This hampers the growth of the company and is a sign of a failing leadership.
It requires both a decisive and a tolerant leader for an organisation to be effective. If any one of the two is absent, the work of the leader, the employees and the organisation would be tarnished.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[2]
Message: Consider using 'do disagree that' or 'do agree that'.
Suggestion: do disagree that; do agree that
...ring and efficient leader. Therefore, I do not agree with the fact that possessing sound moral judgement triump...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ment triumphs the quality of respecting ones peers. I treat both of the above qual...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86175115207 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90864828991 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465437788018 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6498079439 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.1481481481 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0740740741 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.59259259259 5.21951772744 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33257002338 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918395185257 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666144496078 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16224723188 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983631739926 0.0667264976115 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.