The pie graph illustrates the online usage of the variety of languages, while, the table depicted the average number of online users in million compared to the overall world population on the yearly basis from November 1997 to August 2001.
In general, the population of online users showed an upward trend from 1997 to 2001. Moreover, it is clear that English was the dominating language in 2001.
It is clearly seen from the pie chart that online users were 529 million in total in 2011, and 43% of them used English. On the other hand, every other language was shared less than 9% in decreasing order, Japanese, Chinese, German, Spanish, Korean, Italian, French, Portuguese, and Dutch. The lowest proportion related to Dutch speakers which are 2.1%. The other unlisted languages altogether accounted for less than 10%.
Moreover, the number of online users was 76 million in 1997 and accounted for 1,8% of the world population. These figures were doubled in 1998 and reached 147 million and 3,6%, respectively. This number exponentially increased and the online user numbers rose to 513 million and 8,4% in 2001.
- Poor nutrition and obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food would reduce the problem. Do you agree? 61
- The diagram shows the process for labelling shellfish for the international market. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 22
- the graph shows the number of visitors to a variety of art galleries in 2011 38
- the graph shows the number of cases of X disease in Someland between 1960 and 1995. 61
- The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online. The table shows the average number of people online each year. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...d the average number of online users in million compared to the overall world populatio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 26.3917525773 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 937.175257732 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 206.0 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05945945946 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49859566108 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 127.690721649 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 290.88556701 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1038386302 44.8134815571 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6 76.5299724578 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 16.8248392259 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 4.34317383033 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225488240202 0.216113520407 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823136505199 0.0766984524023 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618123665897 0.0603063233224 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133176062101 0.12726935374 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364470604163 0.0580467560999 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 8.37731958763 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 8.71597938144 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 41.2886597938 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.