remains of actual animal tissues in T.rex fossils
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about whether the relics of T.rex's leg bone carries real tissue of this animal. The article strongly postulates that there are three compelling explanations of why they assume there is real tissue. On the other hand, the speaker in the lecture adamantly delineates that none of the author's explanations is persuasive.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, the archaeologist found that there was a hollow which indicated there were blood vessels flowed through it. Furthermore, he asserts that this incredible discover revealed that soft essence existed in the channels which could represent its actual tissues. Nonetheless, the professor offsets these points by declaring that it might show bacteria's residues because after animals would die, bacteria colonized those fossils. Consequently, they left their remains in these chambers.
The lecturer further asserts that in the same place where these T.rex's fossils were found had other primitive animals' relics which had not any red cells in their blood veins. It goes without saying that the author's point of red cells grounded in reddish minerals, not original tissues. These claims refute the writer's implications about the presence of circles which illustrated that red blood cells might once flow through it. Besides, he points out that the spheres had red cores which contained iron- essential part of red cells to disperse oxygen through cells- and fitted with the size of red cells.
The text lastly insists that the experiment of the dinosaur leg bone indicated that it was highly possible to include collagen which was the integral biochemical material that investigators were trying to obtain it. The speaker in the listening counters these indications by mentioning that there was no evidence that collagen lasted long in fossils above 100000 years. However, in the author's point of view, 70-million-years old T.rex's fossil could contain collagen. Hence, the discovery of collagen might have caused by researchers' hand skins who was examining this fossil.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-30 | Yam Kumar Oli | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 81 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | YAGUT | 81 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | rpinisetti8 | 71 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | stupidfella | 73 | view |
- TPO24 Integrated Writing 88
- TPO 32 83
- Every year forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging which is the practice of removing dead trees from affecte 89
- The author states about the reasons that show that the teenage girl in the portrait did belong to Jane Austen. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.First and foremos 80
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd fitted with the size of red cells. The text lastly insists that the experim...
^^
Line 7, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hors point of view, 70-million-years old T.rexs fossil could contain collagen. He...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, lastly, nonetheless, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4237804878 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60968308252 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582317073171 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7720649275 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155233058727 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457730197825 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502523049002 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770860038628 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136816691777 0.0443174109184 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.