There are three ways that government used to protect environment.
1.Enforce the law about pollution
2.Develop friendly-environment resource
3.Protect forest and animal.
Currently, there are a lot of ideals about how the government protects environment. Some people claim that government should enforce the law about pollution; other people declare that government should pay more attention to natural environment to protect animal and forest. However, from my perspective, I believe that to development a friendly-environment resource is an effective method.
First, to develop new friendly-environment resource can reduce the damage to forest and the pollution. Most people damage forest in order to get wood which is an important and valuable resource. Meantime, most pollution comes from the burning of fossil fuels like wood, coal and carbon. Therefore, if the government can produce a new friendly-environment resource, those two puzzles can be solved. This point can be perfectly illustrated with an example about natural gas. Natural gas is a kind of friendly-environment resource, which only produces water and carbon dioxide when it burns. Before discovering natural gas, people usually use carbon or wood. Those two resources both will produce harmful material when they burn. Therefore, I believe government should develop a new friendly-environment resource.
Second, resource is the easiest to fulfill. Wether government preserves environment or uses law to reduce pollution, they both need a relatively longer period of time. As long as some people are poor, they will hunt animals and cut down trees, because they need the fur of animals and the woods to exchange money. So the radical way to protect environment is removing the poverty, which is an almost impossible task in several centuries. However, to develop a new resource is possible, if there are sufficient money and the manpower. People entering information era from industry era spend only 200 years. Thus developing a new resource is not a very difficult task. Thereby, I believe that to develop a new friendly-environment resource is the priority that government should take.
On balance, because developing a new friendly-environment resource is the most quick and efficient way, government should do that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | 1261906566 | 70 | view |
- Some believe that one should spend more time being far awayfrom the people we care about, because it is necessary for people to understand the importance of relationship of people we care about, while o 60
- There are three ways that government used to protect environment.1.Enforce the law about pollution2.Develop friendly-environment resource3.Protect forest and animal. 70
- Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagreewith the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will bewilling to do what other group members want than b 70
- abcd 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 153, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ion, they both need a relatively longer period of time. As long as some people are poor, they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50304878049 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44075240922 2.67179642975 129% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533536585366 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2699076351 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9523809524 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.619047619 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299944403695 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930131234875 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822931547856 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214387667471 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865250497274 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.