The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
When we compare individual for specific role people compete against each other to get that position. Preparing young people for leadership or power in fields that have much competition with experienced persons by instilling them in the competition will make them more erudite. I mostly disagree with the claim for the following reasons.
First and foremost, from an early age, we as a student in the school or primary school are always in competition for different task or grades. So, society seems to go with the student who scores more and most have good impression on the people around him or her. For instance, in school, when the teacher has to choose between the topper student and others for the class leader. The teacher will clear choose the topper as his grade and his nature of competition will make the teacher believe that he is best from the other. This is one of the reasons that competition makes an individual more hardworking which lead him or her to get attention from the society that makes the society to rely on him or her.
Secondly, being in competition makes a person more hardworking and arduous. So that the person gets the top result and stands out from the common public. In this competition, process individual is being prepared for many things such as discipline, vigilance, focus, practice. These things have a major impact on one's leadership quality. For example, if the company has to choose its chief executive officer they will look at the person who is competitive, has a clear view, making the proper decision at the appropriate time. perhaps the person who has that competitive nature from an early age will surely be the best choice.
Finally, the sense of cooperation is also one the important thing that counts when we talk about leadership. Young people majorly lack cooperation with people because of dearth of experience. However, Cooperation must be in the individual who wants to be a great leader. As such, the leader has to deal with different types of person and has to make the decision that needs cooperation and patience for making it happen pragmatically.
This is one reason I agree with the claim.
Of course, some strongly agree with this claim but I mostly disagree for the reason I have explained above. That makes my position for this
- "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen mo 42
- Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numbe 73
- Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons and 90
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...und him or her. For instance, in school, when the teacher has to choose between t...
^^
Line 9, column 528, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Perhaps
...roper decision at the appropriate time. perhaps the person who has that competitive nat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, as to, for example, for instance, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89567430025 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59193999116 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488549618321 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1931957291 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.619047619 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2472895745 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744321011844 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666354181462 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126211281663 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930464839545 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.