Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window

The reading asserts that, glass is one the popular material in modern architecture. But, it is dangerous for birds since they can not recognize the glass and fly through the glass windows. With the aim of solving this problem, the reading passage offers three solutions, the lecture, however, finds this ideas dubious and cast on the ideas proposed by the reading passage.
The author argues that, the first solution is to use one-way glasses instead of regular glasses, so the birds can see the window as a barrier and would not fly through it. Conversely, the lecture brings up the idea that, one-way windows reflect just like mirrors, and the birds can not understand this phenomenon. Thus, they assume the reflection of the sky is the sky, and fly through it.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that, architects can include colorful painted lines and patterns in order to prevent hitting the birds into glass windows. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that, birds see the unpainted areas as open holes so they fly right through them. And if the unpainted spaces were too small, the rooms of the building would be very dark.
Finally, it is stated in the reading passage that, the final solution is to create an artificial magnetic field to guide birds away from buildings due to their natural ability to sense the magnetic fields. In contrast, the professor underscore the fact that, birds use this ability only in very long distances, not in short trips. In short trips they use their eyes and bright light in order to find their ways.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... solutions, the lecture, however, finds this ideas dubious and cast on the ideas pro...
^^^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...netic fields. In contrast, the professor underscore the fact that, birds use this...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, in contrast, in short, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82417582418 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32309529 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542124542125 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0376934275 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235094855129 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982036032524 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979796334138 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14659689947 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675948381859 0.0443174109184 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.