The graphs below show results of survey of college going boys and girls activities other than academic studies.
The circular charts illustrate the non-academic activity proportion of girls and boys in college.
Overall, it can be incurred that the boys spend most of time in the front of screens and playing games. Whereas, girls give more preference to physical activities as compared to suffering the internet.
Initially, it is vividly apparent that surfing the internet was speak in boys activities time. It showed more than 14% of girls( 20%). The boys and girls were played the computer games only 15% and 10% respectively. The both gender spent same time to listen the music it was a 8%.
Secondly, the dancing activities was favourable in girls it ratio more than a fifth. The boys were spend their time on football, basketball and baseball sports it was 13% 20% and 17% respectively. While the girls was spend 12% on sports activities as well as on gyms and aerobics only 6%. The boys were spend 3% hours on reading books and magazines as girls spent 19% only on reading.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | Motu | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Manpreet aujla | 61 | view |
- Some people think that school should educate pupils according to their academic abilities others believe that pupils with different abilities should educate together Discuss the both views and give your opinion 61
- As technological innovation brings about rapid change retraining becomes a lifelong necessity Therefore industry should be take responsibility for the education training of their workers To what extent do you agree to this idea 38
- The graphs below show results of survey of college going boys and girls activities other than academic studies. 61
- Some people think that the environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve while others think that the government cannot solve theSe environmental problems unless individuals make some action. 73
- Sone people like to spent money on look, fashion,cars and other things. Whereas, other are save money for their future endeavours. Discuss both sides. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spoke', 'spoken'.
Suggestion: spoke; spoken
... apparent that surfing the internet was speak in boys activities time. It showed more...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 274, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nt same time to listen the music it was a 8%. Secondly, the dancing activit...
^
Line 13, column 100, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
... ratio more than a fifth. The boys were spend their time on football, basketball and ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 218, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...d 17% respectively. While the girls was spend 12% on sports activities as well as on ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 304, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...yms and aerobics only 6%. The boys were spend 3% hours on reading books and magazines...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84523809524 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59174076277 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.6481446141 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.0 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224125524115 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988171245663 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616308218949 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154276056197 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408642904295 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.