Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, parents are trying to do their best to up bring their children in an excellent fashion. In this regard, I of the opinion that parents today are more engaged in their kids' educational matters than were parents in the past. The reasons to support my viewpoint are elaborated on in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, nowadays, parents are more aware of the importance of education in their children life than past. To be more specific, people today are more knowledgeable than past, and they completely aware the significance of education in the lives of human beings. In this case, they motivate and get involve in their children's education in order to prepare them for their future lives. It is no secret to anyone that, nowadays, one should have a strong academic background in his or her field of study to get a decent and well-paid job in a prestigious company. On the contrary, in the past, most of the parents were not literate, and they are obliged their kids to continue their jobs. Therefore, parents in the past put less efforts to fulfill their children needs in order to become a successful in their education. Besides, having a higher degree were not very common concern among people in the past, since competition among job applicants were less than nowadays to become a hired in companies.
Moreover, people, especially youngsters, are willing to use adults' experiences and information in order to become successful in their educational matters. To put it in other words, as I mentioned in the previous paragraph, parents are well-educated than the past. In this case, children ask their parents' help when they face challenges and problems with their homework in order to enhance their knowledge and find a better solution in a short time. An example can shed some light on this issue. Consider a boy whose father has a Master degree in mathematics field. In this case, it is more preferable and practical to boy to utilize his father knowledge and experience in order to improve his weaknesses in Math course. In addition, parents are able to give some useful and practical advises to their children in most of their course since their kids courses are not very challenging issue for them. On the other hand, fewer children had concern like this since their parents were not well-educated.
In conclusion, contemplating all the mentioned reasons and points, I do believe that parents nowadays are more involved with their children's education than parents had in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-27 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2022-09-02 | dnudlyjgtnudbphwev | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Hello GRE | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-25 | JoeyRussell07 | 83 | view |
- If you make one important change in a school that you attend, what change would you make? 3
- TPO 44 Integrated Writing Task 65
- TOEFL T P O 46 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 60
- TPO 37 Integrated writing 29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an excellent fashion" with adverb for "excellent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...o their best to up bring their children in an excellent fashion. In this regard, I of the opinion that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94549763033 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71975982514 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46682464455 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9688244161 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.842105263 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2105263158 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406303381575 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146025035898 0.076458572812 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107728547036 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325467181017 0.150856017488 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076841380309 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.