In this report I am going to describe two bar charts which provide information about the number of French people who communicated in a local language with their parents during childhood and taught their own children when they became parents.
Overall, the first graph describes the language being spoken habitually and occasionally in the childhood. The second chard shows the number of adults who continued that tradition.
According to the first graph, Alsatian and Occitan were spoked by around 600 000 adults daily, followed by Breton with nearly 250 000 speakers and Creole and Corsican with between 50 and 100 thousand speakers. On the other hand, Occitan was the most spoken language from time to time and the number of speakers was over 1 million. The second most preferred language was Breton with around 400 000 speakers. The number of people who spoke Corsican and Creole occasionally was around 100 000.
In the second chart, it is obvious that the majority of parents spoke Alsatian to their children (nearly 400 000). The second most popular language was Occitan with around 250 000 speakers. The number of the rest three languages (Breton, Creole and Corsican) spoken by adults to their children were under 100 000.
This ends my report.
- The charts below show the number of French adults whose parents spoke a French regional language to them when they were children and the number who speak a French regional languange to their own children 64
- In some socities stress is now regarded as a major problem and it is thought that people suffer from more stress than they did in the past. However, others feel that the amount of stress people have today is exaggerated they say that previous generations 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03365384615 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3686217296 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504807692308 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.2039234327 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1818181818 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261078787722 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104765305748 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931401670663 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147491835987 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104621494101 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.