Given are two figures regarding the foreign languages that British students of a university were able to speak by 2000 and 2010.
It is clear from the pie charts that with 30% and 35% of the Brit students speaking Spanish by 2000 and 2010 respectively, the named language was the most popular second language. By 2000 one of every five students was able to talk only his or her first language, in contrast, the rate halved a decade later. Being multilingual with two foreign languages increased and reached 15%, by a fifty percent rise during ten years.
French is the sole language of figures that became less popular. The rate of Brit students who talk french was 15% firstly, although it declined significantly and reached 10% by 2010. Remaining constant, one out of ten British students could speak German during the period in question. Though other languages have not underlined the figures,15% of students were bilingual with them in 2000. The rate was a fifth in 2010.
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 56
- TPO 45- independent writing taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use s 90
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, regarding, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 937.175257732 87% => OK
No of words: 167.0 206.0 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85628742515 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53750949288 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.622605031667 95% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 290.88556701 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7402057194 44.8134815571 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1111111111 76.5299724578 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 16.8248392259 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 4.34317383033 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262147118699 0.216113520407 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112735898063 0.0766984524023 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798478048599 0.0603063233224 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215606516052 0.12726935374 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648035132938 0.0580467560999 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 8.37731958763 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 70.7449484536 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 7.45979381443 106% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 41.2886597938 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.