The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville:
"Over the past three years, there has been a marked increase in cases of 'sidewalk rage,' similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road, but instead among sidewalk walkers. The result is an increase in assaults, property damage, and disruptions of normal pedestrian traffic. In order to address this growing problem, the council must ban cell phone use on sidewalks. Not only do people texting or using their phones slow down pedestrian traffic, but they are also more likely to walk into the road or bump into other walkers. Children are especially vulnerable because they are too short to be easily seen. Middletown passed such a ban and not only have they heard no complaints, but the reported incidents of sidewalk crime has gone down significantly."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
To reduce the sidewalk rage amongst the pedestrians, a ban on use of cell phones has been imposed on them. Although it has turned out to reduce the number of complaints to almost negligible, it is not enough to curb out this issue in the long run as it has not addressed the major issues for the pedestrians themselves.
One of the highlighting issue of sidewalk rage is caused due to assaults. Although the ban of cell phones would keep the pedestrians alert, but the major issue is still there: people who plan out these assaults. They generally tend to pick up their targets by observing their actions, and probably taking into account when the pedestians are least attentive, which almost eliminates the factor whether the pedestrian is using. their smartphone or not.
Another major issue is property damage, which is usually caused by numerous other factors such as public works, vandalizers, inattentive pedestrians and sometimes even assaulters. This accounts a very small percentage of people who were using cell phones at the time of damage caused as damage to public property is usually a. collective effort rather than an individual one.
Now, it is agreeable that usual bumps to other pedestrians is a major issue caused by cell phone users, but as for vulnerability of children pon sidewalks is concerned, it is also caused majorly either by negligence of their guardians or by playfulness or naughtiness of children, which cannot be accounted for. These kind of factors, even if taken in mind comes out as an exception mostly.
Ban of use of smartphones on sidewalks ny Middletown is an effective step towards reducing sidewalk rage of pedestrians, but alone, it might not serve for pedestrians in the long run. So, other effective steps must be taken in accordance with this one, so that the root of the problem could be dealt with effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Chayank_11 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | HANZALA13 | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | zzk81 | 69 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | somba | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Venkateshwar | 63 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accomodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 58
- The charts below show three types of police reports from the city of Johnstown in 2016 along with Johnstown s average monthly temperature Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Friendships can be very meaningful and special but also very complicated What are the qualities of a great friend What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time 56
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 314 350
No. of Characters: 1512 1500
No. of Different Words: 167 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.21 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.815 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.728 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.545 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.949 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.376 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.686 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Their
...factor whether the pedestrian is using. their smartphone or not. Another major i...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctors such as public works, vandalizers, inattentive pedestrians and sometimes ev...
^^
Line 13, column 313, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...hildren, which cannot be accounted for. These kind of factors, even if taken in mind comes...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, as for, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 16.3942115768 18% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 314.0 441.139720559 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7993847959 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 204.123752495 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550955414013 0.468620217663 118% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 705.55239521 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8566071748 57.8364921388 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.769230769 119.503703932 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 23.324526521 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 5.70786347227 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0390884497417 0.218282227539 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0184409385364 0.0743258471296 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316210123545 0.0701772020484 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0249949895975 0.128457276422 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017378722701 0.0628817314937 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 98.500998004 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.