Some people believe that goup learnings process is beneficial. But, some other prefer to learn alone. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the group learning process has become popular. Some people prefer to learn things in a team instead of lonely. This essay will completely agree with this view.
One of the key reasons why learning in a team is preferable to educating lonely is that group learning demand less time for the learning process. Generally, a student cannot understand all the contents in a single lecture of the mentor. In a group, any member who does not realize any issue properly is expected to find assistance from other members within the group without taking a significant amount of time. Thus, the required time for the learning would be fewer in a group in comparison to that of individually. To illustrate, during my university time, rarely have I finished any project on time when I worked alone.
Another critical reason for choosing group learning over learning alone is that the team learning process teaches the way of collaborating with group members. Most often, people who learn things in a group usually learn a part of the project and assist other members to understand their assigned parts; later they cooperate to understand the entire content. Therefore, people who conduct their learning process absorb the collaboration process better than those who learn individually. According to a recent study by Oxford University, most of the students who worked in group projects adjust well with colleagues in their professional workplace.
In conclusion, learning in a group is superior to that of alone, because this will require less time for the learning process and facilitate to grasp the co-operation procedure with team members. In reality, the more the people learn in a team, the superior the people’s efficiency will be.
- Some people believe that goup learnings process is beneficial. But, some other prefer to learn alone. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- In recent time, extensive marketing and promotional activities forced people to buy things out of the necessity. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- In many countries senior positions have higher salaries compared to those of young workers of the same company. Some people think this isn’t justified. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Today it is common practice for many business meetings and business training to take place online.Do the advantages of this new development outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- In many countries senior positions have higher salaries compared to those of young workers of the same company. Some people think this isn’t justified. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will completely agree with this view. One of the key reasons why learning in a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... project on time when I worked alone. Another critical reason for choosing gro...
^^^^
Line 9, column 38, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to group'
Suggestion: to group
... Another critical reason for choosing group learning over learning alone is that th...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gues in their professional workplace. In conclusion, learning in a group is su...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17957746479 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76622326872 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531690140845 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2041259137 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288367069709 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11926008962 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912746107692 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204054602945 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051692087905 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.