countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
The global exporters export many local products from countries to other countries which give rise to some people acclaims that similarity between countries is increasing more and more while others swear by actually the opposite is true and there is only a slight similarity. In the subsequent paragraphs, I try to articulate both ideas and their reasons.
People who agree with this idea, reason that you can buy souvenirs or local products which are belonged to foreign countries easily in the mall. The most common example for this is olive which can not grow up in some countries, but you can observe and buy any kind of it in the malls.
With this in mind, others strongly believe that it is probably a bit counter-intuitive idea, since there many differences between countries in many arenas. Locals and tribes differ from country to country where both, together would have exclusive culture and local cuisine which you can only enjoy in their place. There is no wonder why these are tourism pole in every country while in many cases exporter can only export industrial foods not local. For instance, china wall which is famous in the world and it surrounded all over this country can not be mock in any country or rebuild.
Also, it should be noted that nature is the other evident which can not be denied. Due to the climate and culture which are differ from country to country, the nature in every country is as well as new world, since, you can see Sahara in Asia and become fussy and wet in the hot weather, on the contrary you can experience mild climate and woodland in Europe.
To wrap it up and bring my opinion about this idea in the light, I think that despite the global village that world is becoming, this idea is partly true and absolutely some things can not be exported or artificially constructed such as nature.
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Government should spend money to encourage the development of sport and art for school students, rather than supporting professional sports and art performances for the general public.Do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion. 67
- Should university give financial support to sports and social activities or to the classes and library? 60
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1997 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cases'' or 'case's'?
Suggestion: cases'; case's
...ism pole in every country while in many cases exporter can only export industrial foo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'differed'.
Suggestion: differed
...ue to the climate and culture which are differ from country to country, the nature in ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, well, while, for instance, i think, kind of, such as, as well as, in many cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71826625387 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40819911536 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8833178449 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.545454545 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3636363636 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177809612427 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678479496122 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722709010381 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103125855002 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695644667019 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.