Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
For evidence, we should determine what is the total population in the area. Next, count number of lives affected by cow flu and number of person died as a result of inoculations.
Determine the severity of cow flu disease and its symptoms.
Firstly, asses the overall health of the person affected by cow flu, if this person has weak immune system or more serious health concern and if incoluations further deteriorates person's health then inoculations is better not be administered to the person. In this case i agree with arguement.
If cow flu is deadly, and person affected by cow flu overall health is good then i feel administering inoculation must be considered. Person affected by cow flu must be given choice of whether or not he wants inoculation by explaining him the side effects and also benefits of it.
If total number of persons affected by cow flu and dying of cow flu are more in number then administering inoculation must be considered as there is only a small possibility of person dying from inoculation.
If total number of person affected by and dying of cow flu is less in number and if cow flu is not deadly then not permitting to administer innoculation is a better choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | Swetha Kulkarni | 33 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Vaikunth | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Vaikunth | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | vijaykaushik132 | 58 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | vijaykaushik132 | 50 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 33
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...dministered to the person. In this case i agree with arguement. If cow flu is d...
^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... by cow flu overall health is good then i feel administering inoculation must be ...
^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...cted by cow flu must be given choice of whether or not he wants inoculation by explaining him ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...and dying of cow flu are more in number then administering inoculation must be consi...
^^^^
Line 11, column 63, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
...son affected by and dying of cow flu is less in number and if cow flu is not deadly then not p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 127, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'administering'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'permit' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: administering
...w flu is not deadly then not permitting to administer innoculation is a better choice.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, then, i feel, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 11.3162921348 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 2235.4752809 45% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 209.0 442.535393258 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8038277512 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.55969084622 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8873130318 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 215.323595506 46% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468899521531 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 704.065955056 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8982535822 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29451944327 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143318940269 0.0831039109588 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754413536604 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180453268127 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497706727188 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 100.480337079 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.