Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
For a person, it is very difficult to get out of their comfort zone and think of a new idea. And even thinking one of these amazing idea and to have the tenacity to see through them is an accomplishment in itself, and might eventually leave an impression of sorts.
Most of the entrepreneurs that we see and want to become were one time ambitious like any one of us, with an idea that might just change the world. Likes of Steve Jobs and Bill Gates had an idea of a machine that could eventually help us in our daily chores. Sceptics said that it would be incomprehensible for something other than our brain to help us even. As of now, how I am able to send this message, is a result of their tenacious efforts they put together to make world a better place.
Had the ideas of modern science were not allowed to have a breakthrough by people such as Newton, Edison, Einstein, Wright brothers and many more, we would have still be stuck in stone age, playing with rocks and stones rather than having the freedom to explore ideas like them, and to see them through.
That said, these ideas can also have the pitfalls as well. The basic idea by Einstein about change in energy brought us about with the idea of power plants, but also encourage development of weapons like grenades and rockets, which can cause chaos throughout. The idea of Samuel Colt for everyone to have a weapon for their protection is now used against that populace to spread the terror which he tried to avoid. And the nuclear fission, which is one of the most efficient way to produce energy for daily household, is also used in Weapons of Mass Destruction, with both having the same general idea behind them.
So, it can be revered that although critisizing any idea is wrong in itself, but it must be kept in check to not become an idea that would leave a wrong sort of lasting impression as there is a very fine line in doing right and wrong, with both having a same general idea behind them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | NRS | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | somba | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | anirudh8860 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | shubhendrapalsinghal | 83 | view |
- The bar chart shows the top ten countries for production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be 50
- The charts below show the total number of applicants the year before and the year after Doolittle University s social media advertising campaign organized by age range and how close the applicants live to the university Summarize the information by select 67
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and to have the tenacity to see through them is an accomplishment in itself, and...
^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...hers and many more, we would have still be stuck in stone age, playing with rocks ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, well, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47933884298 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36449347768 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526170798898 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4101513948 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.25 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148363692656 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591814317235 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284871044266 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855867383844 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211834312097 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.