There has been a remarkable increase in the number of people who believe that TV sporting shows, such as the World Football Cup, the Wimbledon encourage the young people to exercise and sport. This essay will delve both sides of this view before drawing a reasonable conclusion. I definitely agree that these TV programs inspire the young people, specifically teenagers to exercise through famous sporters and great successfuls.
Admittedly, the positive aspects of sporting shows on young people are often discussed in terms of two key areas, which are body conditions of famous athletes and competition feelings. Perhaps the main advantage of these shows is that young people might be encouraged to exercise in order to have exellent physical ability and masculen body. A good illustration of this is that according to a report published by the New York Times, there is a pronounced correlation between the number of teenagers who joined a sport club and time of the Olympics. Secondly, after decades of speculation, teenager psychologists now have fairly accurate information concerning teenagers’ competition feelings and TV sporting shows. Young people might be encouraged by sport programs to do regular exercise because teenagers believe that they can easily cope with complex issues thanks to do regular exercise. Hence, television programs might be useful in order to motivate the youth to exercise.
Despite these arguments, drawbacks of TV sporting shows should not be underestimated by both parents and the governments. The primary disadvantage of this is that these programs can cause tension, which in turn leads to conflicts between young people who come from different countries. For instance, an Indian student killed his classmate due to a discuss, which stems from a national football match, in the last year. Furthermore, TV sporting programs can cause not only conflicts but also waste time. Young people spend on these programmes lots of their times rather than do exercise. Thus, authorities and parents should be prudent concerning perilous of TV sporting shows.
In conclusion, the decision as to whether sporting shows motivate the youth exercise must be taken in the context of the entire society. However, my personal view is that these programs encourage the young people to do regular exercise and sport through televisions.
- Grandparents play a big role in bringing up the children. Do you think it is useful for grandparents? Discuss reasons with your opinion and give relevant examples. 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal. some people, however, think that other types of progress and equally important for a country. 67
- Shopping has become a favorite pastime among young people. Why do you think it is like that, and do you think they must be encouraged to do other things rather than shopping? 73
- People are less fit and active nowadays than in the past. What are the reasons for this? What measures can be taken to fix this? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ian student killed his classmate due to a discuss, which stems from a national football m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...g shows. In conclusion, the decision as to whether sporting shows motivate the youth exerc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37365591398 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85538413881 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529569892473 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2681324542 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.588235294 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203909490633 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069886041336 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475787548823 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141504152788 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443245713639 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.