The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates how the share prices of Facebook, Google, Apple, and Yahoo changed over the period from 2011 to 2016.
Overall, Apple’s stock price showed the largest variation throughout the time period, while the figures of Google remained stable at the lowest value compared to the others. Furthermore, the share value of Yahoo witnessed a gradual decline whilst Facebook’s stock price increased significantly over the period given.
In 2011, Facebook’s share valued at around 7,500, which was equal to Yahoo’s stock value. It then increased consistently over the next 5 years to just under 20,000 in 2016 and became the most expensive stock in the market at that time. In contrast, the stock price of Yahoo saw a considerable decrease from just over 6,000 in 2011 to just under 2,500 in 2016.
Meanwhile, Apple’s stock price started off at just under 5,000 at the beginning of the period, rocketed to more than 33,000 in the next year, then dropped sharply to approximately 6,000 in 2013 before fluctuated between roughly 12,000 in 2014 and 6,000 in 2016. Particularly, Google’s share value stayed at the same value at approximately 500 over the entire period, and it was the cheapest stock among the others.
- Topic: Some would say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Many people are now opting to provide technology companies with their personal data in exchange for access to software Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The pie graph below shows how electricity is produced in Ireland and the table shows the primary reasons for using electricity in the same country. 84
- Lectures given by teachers in universities used to be the only ways of teaching students however nowadays technology has evolved and made it possible to study online This cause many people to believe that lecture system will not be needed in the future Do 91
- Many people use distance learning programmes to study at home but some people think that it can not bring the same benefits of attending college or university. To what extend, do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26108374384 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86730822863 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541871921182 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3834095438 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125969726837 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741819387097 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440997833572 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999583622766 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401873313484 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.