The graph below shows the changes in the place where people used to surf the internet in the years 1998,2000,2002 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant.
The below given bar graphs illustrate the variation took place for internet usage in year 1998, 2000, 2000 and 2004. It is explicitly clear that maximum people used internet from home in all the given years.
The proportion of internet surfed from work in 1998, 2000 and 2004 was almost similar, which was just around a quarter. It can also be noted that people who accessed internet from college in 1998 and 2000 was relatively constant. Whereas, from all the given years internet used from college in 2002 was the highest.
Internet used from library in 1998 was accounted for 12%, and experienced a rise of two-fold in 2002. Whereas, for other two years, 2002 and 2004 was fairly constant.
To summarize, internet usage from home was the highest of all given years, as opposed to usage from library was the lowest
- he table below gives information about population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002.Summarize information and make comparison which relevant. 73
- A large amount of advertisements nowadays are now targeted at children Many people say this has negative effects on children and should therefore be banned to what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The graph below shows the changes in the place where people used to surf the internet in the years 1998,2000,2002 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrient, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 61
- Nowadays most people are not as fit and active, as they were in the past. What are the main causes of this situation? Suggest some possible solutions. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... 1998 and 2000 was relatively constant. Whereas, from all the given years internet used...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 690.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85915492958 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25149556855 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528169014085 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 193.5 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.7066164765 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.25 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203481298316 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115970515899 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661711540139 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140908534728 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858296019946 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.