These days parent concern about their children regarding lots of unsuitable problems or canals on TV such as films, serials and cartoons even, so some people believe that the government should attention to this issue and another view is that what is essential for children, controlling them.in my opinion is that both of them have to responsible and they must work each other. Following we give reasons and argue about issue.
Generally every governments of countries have duties about their people, especially children. In fact, in every society educating and growing are important points for future of them. For example; the governments encourage artists, director or writer to making effective programs or even advertising another people that work on TV to built a constructive program for limit ages. In the other hand, if the governments help to society through suitable programs, it can be predicated countries will have safe societies in future for all world.
In addition, what is considerably essential in order to educate children is that parents have to learn and improve their knowledge for their children. It could be happened in several courses. For example the governments are able to get some classes for parents that how should react and manage their children regarding TV at home?.
In the whole, improving some skills for educating adults need to help and learn. Obviously there is a key point that not only the governments should help and make impressive situations, but parents also have vital roles about this that they control their children what material on TV is suitable and which one is damage for them.
- It is often argued that children must be protected from unsuitable material on TV and the Internet by government censorship. Others say that this is the parents' responsibility to control what their children do and watch. To what extent do you think 73
- the below chart gives information about the ageing population worldwide in 2000 and makes predictions for 2050. 80
- It is often argued that children must be protected from unsuitable material on TV and the Internet by government censorship. Others say that this is the parents' responsibility to control what their children do and watch. To what extent do you think 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, for example, in addition, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11985018727 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61762118958 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.0290090635 49.4020404114 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.272727273 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25189832838 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959708925667 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835092982261 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174747569127 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570223991419 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.