The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The line graphs depict the information about the number of queries arrived in the Tourist Information Office between January to June month in one city in the year of 2011.
Overall, in-person enquiry showed a steady but significant rose in the period, while by email or letter query experienced a downward trend. Telephone enquiry had some fluctuations.
On the one hand, person enquiry in the month of Jan was about 420 and it the least one in the starting month and the next following months it rose significantly 600 and 800 respectively. Between Mar to Apr person query increase dramatically to around 1250. At the end of the period, it holds the maximum number of queries. with around 1900. However, through a letter or email queries showed a gradual decrease in Jan it is accounted for just below 800 and in Feb it decreases slightly to almost 700. From Feb to Mar email or letter enquiries were stagnant. Between Mar to May, it plummeted under 400 and in Jun it is stagnant as the same previous month and it holds the least number of queries received at the end of the period.
On the other hand, starting the month of the Jan it holds the highest number of telephone queries received with more than 800 and subsequent month also it received the largest number when compared to others while it decreased to the previous month to 800. In Mar, it rose to 1000 and still holds the highest number queries but the next month it was stagnant and the person query moved the maximum enquiry. Between Apr to Jun, telephone enquiries rose gradually and at the end of the period, it rose to 1600.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lunanguyen0701 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates, aged 20-24, in one European country over a two-year period. 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 67
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons. 56
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...it holds the maximum number of queries. with around 1900. However, through a letter ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 284.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66197183099 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48391971915 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43661971831 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5055054001 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313476632776 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104399920866 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951872529788 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215666141499 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100171057749 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.