As more and more students enter universities, academic qualifications are becoming devalued. To get ahead in many professions, more than one degree is now required and in future it is likely that people will take a number of degree courses before even starting work. This is an undesirable situation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Although, it is undeniable that a university degree plays an important role in securing a job but it does not assert professional success. With the surge in the number of students in the universities, there is an increase competition in the job market. However, it does not mean that the academic qualifications has less significance. In this essay, I will explore the idea that in order to accelerate professional career in future, it is inconsequential to acquire more than one degree and support that multiple university degrees do not confirm success.
Having multiple degree does not guaranty a job. Perhaps, having degree in different disciplines broadens the options of job type but it does not promise a sustainable job. The industry seeks for professional with first hands experience than just having a knowledge or a piece of paper provided by an institution. If you can not get success in your profession because of having just one university degree than the second degree would not make things any different.
Talent is still sought the most, by most, of the multinational company. For instance, Google and amazon have an extremely varied recruitment process which sets them apart from other companies which are struggling to rise up. Google hunts for talent and real-life skill to create good products and services. What it shows is that one should acquire multitude of skills and talent than multiple degrees.
In conclusion, despite of the fact that degree impart a great role to start a job it is highly overrated. From the ancient time, skill and talent and right attitude has always been in demand.
“An innovative idea can lead to professional success over a piece of paper given by an institution”
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | JayinOZ | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Neha1784 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-27 | Prabhu Krishnan | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-16 | essayevaluation | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-19 | Parth Chandarana | 73 | view |
- Wealth does not necessarily guaranty happiness.To what extent do you agree with this statement?Provide reasons for your answer. Include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
- Some people believe that a greater difference in age between parents and children is more beneficial than less of a difference. Do you think the advantages of a greater age difference outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people believe that a greater difference in age between parents and children is more beneficial than less of a difference. Do you think the advantages of a greater age difference outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers. Other people believe that it results in disadvantages for workers. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 78
- In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...order to accelerate professional career in future, it is inconsequential to acquire more ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of paper given by an institution'
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, apart from, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10175438596 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95778027291 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9657851817 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160325497476 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521450798376 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556251268692 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757456001838 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758499283367 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.