The chart below shows the percentage of people using various forms of transport in France.
The bar chart compares four means of transport in France in terms of the proportion of commuters using them in the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, Bus and Car were the most popular mode of transport during the period shown. Additionally, while the percentage of car users increased dramatically, the figure for others decreased.
In 1990, nearly 70% of people travelled by bus, compared to just over a half of commuters using car. After a period of 10 years, the proportion of bus users gradually dropped to around 55% while that of car drivers moderately went up to the same figure of bus riders in 1990. In the year 2010, car witnessed a drastic rise in the proportion of its commuters to just over 90%, and this figure was threefold higher than that of bus riders.
Train was the second common form of transport in 2009, with over 60% of people riding, and this figure significantly felt by 20% before gradually rising to around 55% in 2010. Similarly, bicycle also experienced 18% decrease in the proportion of bike riders over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime Do you agree or disagree 77
- Cinema attendance by age group 78
- Oil Production Capacity 73
- Holiday accommodation chosen by the British in 2010 91
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtion of bike riders over the period.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60719930693 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56043956044 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5760032392 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120662780731 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565394381454 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520079432792 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842972219047 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378983870604 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.