Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do.
-How far do you agree?
-What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?
Nobody can deny that there are certain professionals like nurses, doctors and teachers who are essential to the fabric of society, and who should therefore be rewarded accordingly. However, this is seldom the case. When we look at the salaries and fees commanded by certain film stars and actresses and people who run large companies, this does not seem fair.
First of all, not all film stars earn huge sums of money. In fact, at any one time in the UK, for example, roughly 80 per cent of actors are out of work and on top of that the number who are paid so-called ‘telephone number fees’ is ...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-02 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
2020-08-02 | vdrobny | 84 | view |
2018-02-27 | ravigujar123 | 89 | view |
2016-08-25 | ravibharaths | 85 | view |
2015-06-25 | roxanaluca | 58 | view |
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. 95
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment 95
- Some people find history a fascinating subject. Others say it is dull and has no place in modern life.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 80
- There have been major advances in technology over recent decades and this has led to significant improvements in people's lives. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 85
- Finland telephone calls report. -Syerapke- (rewrite)Prompt :The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995-2004. 70
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.031 0.07
Pay attention to coherence.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 269 350
No. of Characters: 1235 1500
No. of Different Words: 165 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.05 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.591 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.569 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 81 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 54 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.214 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.799 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.286 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.534 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.031 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5