Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do.
How far do you agree?
What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?
There has been a prevailing opinion that some specific types of work like doctors and teachers are underestimated and underpaid. At the same time, celebrities and company presidents earn a disagreeably tremendous amount of money. This essay will indicate the factors affecting each occupation’s salary and state my perspective on this statement.
As for the importance of education and healthcare, I genuinely agree with the given viewpoint. Health and knowledge are required in almost every aspect of life, from taking care of families to pursuing careers. To be more precise, teachers provide knowledge and training as the key to shaping the future workforce; therefore, educators can be considered the decisive factor of the growth of a nation. Medical practitioners are also of significance on account of saving peoples’ lives, which is invaluable. By contrast, actors, via their films, would only give temporary entertainment, and bosses do not even have a direct impact on people’s lives. Thus I hold a strong belief that nurses, doctors, and teachers, who do the most indispensable jobs on a daily basis and are the backbone of our society, should be required to get lucrative income.
There are, henceforth, a range of feasible criteria to evaluate one’s earning. Initially, every salary should be based on the impact which their jobs make on society. Should their work be beneficial to a huge community and help them upgrade the standard of living, their income shall be high in return. Besides, the demand of the occupation is another important criterion. The higher and more complex to meet the requirements of the job, the more wages should be paid. For example, doctors, which require a long time of difficult learning and practicing, should be given more salary.
In conclusion, I truly agree that doctors and teachers should be paid more and the impact on the community and the difficulty of the job should be regarded as the crucial factors to evaluate one’s earning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-02 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-02 | vdrobny | 84 | view |
| 2018-02-27 | ravigujar123 | 89 | view |
| 2016-08-25 | ravibharaths | 85 | view |
| 2015-06-25 | roxanaluca | 58 | view |
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people are of the opinion that women should play an equal role in police or military forces like the army Others believe that this work is unsuitable for women Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...have a direct impact on people’s lives. Thus I hold a strong belief that nurses, doc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20743034056 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91058887022 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59133126935 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3050380691 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.125 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230855845367 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065863673801 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054846758948 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136878212622 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330918225315 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.